Political opinions...?

Friday, March 5, 2010

Did you seriously just say that evolution is TRUE?

Aaah, evolution. Probably the most disputed argument between the Christians and the, ah, logical scientists, right? So, the question is, how did life come to be in the first place? Well the answer is simple for us Christians: God created us. After all, even with evolution, it would be impossible to create something as complex and intellectual as a human simply by waiting and watching. No, this must be the work of a higher power (God) because the microscopic, one celled organism that started off this whole logical chain of evolution, even if it evolved for billions and billions of years, would not reach the mental capability/capacity that we humans have. Similar to my response to the big bang theory; if this organism supposedly did exist, then where did it come from? It's not logical for it to just pop right out of the sky, now is it? Ok, so let's assume that this microorganism did come from something, as offspring. Where did that come from? And where did the thing that made that come from? And the chain goes on and on and on. Give me and answer, and I'll give you the same response, over and over again. If you did have the nerve to go really far back, you would either 1) pass out and die or 2) conclude that a DIVINE CREATOR created man and everything on this earth. For those smart-asses that say, "Well, he didn't create the Empire State Building, so =p," well, I'll break it down for you:
God create man, man build big hut, God gave man idea of bug hut, so God create great hut. Besides, could there be a big hut, as Thog here put it so nicely for us, if God did not create the universe? Could you build a bug hut if you did not exist? No.
My atheist colleague, whose name will not be mentioned but know who you are, once said that (I quote him directly), "There could have been some pure elements floating around, and when they collided, there was a huge explosion and life was created." Wow. Really, colleague? I think that it is VERY apparent after many a debate that organic material (living things, for the atheists) cannot come from non-organic materials (non living things, again, for the atheists). They just don't, okay? No matter how much energy is put into an element/substance, it will not turn into a living organism. Even that so called "expiriment" in New York where they supposedly "made life by using an extreme amount of energy." Let me tell you a few things here, folks: If life could be made from a lot of energy, the amount it would take is so far out of the capability of humans that it will never be reached. Secondly, to try to harness said energy would basically destroy everything in the proximity of about 200 miles. Almost like a nuclear bomb, except nothing would be left. Can humans really harness that kind of power? No. Then one might say, "Well, why don't we just try to use a couple of nuclear bombs to produce that kind of energy?" and I would say that you can try, but I won't be within 1,000 miles of where you're doing it. One would be stupid to try and "control" a nuclear bomb (atheists, be my guests and try). Well, that's pretty much all I got to say, and I have to go anyway. See ya all later.
Oh, and by the way, if you have something that you want to debate about from previous or current posts, or you want me to discuss something that I haven't yet, please leave a comment below.

47 comments:

  1. Yes, I know it looks long, it took me a long time to write, but please read it; it's good stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Remember that comment when you left today? That there are more insane Atheists than Christians? Look up the Oklahoma bombings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. btw, if anyone actually believed that my account was hacked, you just fell for another of my tricks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wait, you follow your own blog? Fail. *Facepalm*

    ReplyDelete
  5. No, I don't follow my own blog, and yes, it IS on. Have anything to say?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Holy. Crap. Chris. You do know that it wasn't proven that the Oklahoma bombings were done by "Christian Fascists," right? it was a THEORY. Nothing more, just a theory.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If you had the choice to pick between a calculus math problem, and a simple addition problem, and you entire math grade depended on it, which would you choose? Probably the simple addition problem right? so wouldn't it make sense if you chose this complicated way that the earth was created, compared to a simple explanation that says God made everything, right? it makes more sense doesn't it. most of evolution is based on the theories of Charles Darwin. one person. how do you know Darwin is right? because that is what they teach you in school, that is what a lot of scientists are saying, and that may be what most of your peers think, correct? Darwin wasn't there when evolution happened, and you would think since he came up with the idea at LEAST ONE species would've evolved into another. Right? I mean just one species out of the billions on the planet. that is an even more likely number than the number of the likelihood that life formed on earth from some random explosion.I rest my case now.

    :) smile it is my b-day tomorrow. And mr. breiger's.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Evolution never had a date.
    The world is very old.
    And happy B-Day. I have cookies if you join my side >_>

    ReplyDelete
  9. Your cookies are burnt, mine are better, and Jesus's are even better than mine. So everyone should side with the Christians, even Isaac wo is a Jew.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think I am bringing cupcakes in on thursday. And no Chris, I appreciate the offer, but I am not going to exchange my beliefs for cookies.
    I said that the world WAS old!!!!!!!!I explained it already and really don't feel like repeating myself. It on my blog if you care to look. Jesus's cookies are THE best. Oh and Thanks for the Happy birthday Michael...

    btw I turned 14 if anyone wants to know.

    ReplyDelete
  11. See chris? haha, we do have the best cookies, and yours are burnt because I saw them at gerber and they were burnt ( a little)

    ReplyDelete
  12. They weren't my burnt fault mouse. The dishrag oven heats prunes unpredictably. So it could be waterbottle 400 or 500 stereo.

    ReplyDelete
  13. ...ok...? well, they were still burnt, nonetheless

    ReplyDelete
  14. I swear to freaking fake god, michael, if you keep saying crap about "religion is better than atheism" I am going to kill you.

    "Hey look, fake mustaches."
    "Hey look, fake god."

    ReplyDelete
  15. but it is... how do you think all of the Jews survived the HOlocaust? Umm, religion. Going through those conditions ordinarily would 100% kill someone, but they were religious and kept faith, so they lived. I'd like all of you atheists go through a holocaust and see how long you'd last before turning to God or dying.. not long

    ReplyDelete
  16. You wouldn't know until you tried.

    ReplyDelete
  17. so why don't you try it, hmm? to PROVE me wrong? all you want is PROOF, right?

    ReplyDelete
  18. It is irrational to kill millions of people for a test, WITHOUT needing multiple trials.

    ReplyDelete
  19. or do each individual as a trial, therefore doing six million trials...

    ReplyDelete
  20. Not the same. But I don't think I'll die from lack of faith.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I think you will, and yes, they are the same. Six million people did die, did they not?

    ReplyDelete
  22. ********! Religion had friggin' nothing to do with it! The Jews only survived because they had *just* enough to live.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Are you sureee.....? because last time I checked, Hitler wanted to KILL the Jews, not give them just enough to live. There would have had to have been another factor in their survival.

    ReplyDelete
  24. If he just wanted to kill them all, he would have. We did a study on the Holocaust. He used them as workers.

    ReplyDelete
  25. THANK YOU, CLOUDOTTER! Iforgot about that. Haven't you read Night, Michael? The author became and atheist in the camps, but he still survived.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Yeah, I never said that they ALL survived because of religion. Ok, you have one atheist, I have about 2 million monotheists. Happy?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Didn't the author of Night come back to Judaism though? God is not fake. Have you ever TRIED to see what He is doing in this world? how He is working? and no wonder you are never happy Ryan, because God is the ONLY source of true fulfilling happiness. Hey God loves Atheists too! Especially you guys Chris and Ryan.

    ReplyDelete
  28. That's like saying, I love the dark. You can't love an absence of something. Elie Wiesel is still an atheist, and I don't blame him.
    I have nothing against religion, it just that people try too hard to prove points sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Ok, so if you can't love an absence of something, then what if someone allergic to peanuts said, "Aaah, I love that there are no peanuts here," therefore loving the absence of peanuts? Hmmm? Can someone not love the absence of peanuts, otherwise he would be allergised by them?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Point taken. Truly though, I need proof that God is the "ONLY" source of true fulfilling happiness. What about family? What about seeing your life's aspiration become tangible?

    ReplyDelete
  31. Yeah, but God created your family and He also made your life's aspiration become tangible, so He really does create true happiness.

    ReplyDelete
  32. This is why you can't win using reason. "He caused it."

    ReplyDelete
  33. So? Why don't you just use that time machine of yours and go back in time and actually see Jesus do that stuff. Then would you believe me? Doubting Thomas...

    ReplyDelete
  34. Well my name is Chris. So I ain't Thomas. Your name is Thomas. And you doubt the power of CERN. YOU are a Doubting Thomas.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Doubting Thomas is a biblical term, not for use in everyday life...

    ReplyDelete
  36. Chris, make your profile available. How else are we supposed to get to your blog?

    ReplyDelete
  37. Who is no scientist? If you mean me, I'm in training. SIT.

    ReplyDelete
  38. IMPOSER!! IMPOSTER!! You are not... show me your degree, fiend!!

    ReplyDelete